Amsterdam, the Netherlands – Successful employer-driven disability initiatives share certain characteristics, even when the companies and programs differ in other ways. According to new research published in the Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, companies whose leadership teams are committed to inclusion for people with disabilities and are guided by complementary values deeply embedded in their organizations experienced improved performance, positive employee perceptions, and a cohesive, unified culture. The fidelity and prominence of the disability-inclusive actions and practices moderated their relative outcomes.
Disability is commonplace in society but not in the US labor market. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Department of Labor, the participation rate of people with disabilities in the workplace in 2023 is nearly half that experienced by people without disabilities.
“Employer-driven disability initiatives can indeed have a positive impact on both company performance and organizational climate. Our study identified the motivations and best practices that led to successful outcomes: Improved business and financial results, better morale, and unity within the company,” explained lead investigator Brian N. Phillips, PhD, CRC, Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation Counseling, Utah State University. “These best practices should serve as a beacon to other organizations to actively recognize disability as a valued part of company diversity.”
The findings suggest that employers can gain a great deal from seeing the disabled as a valuable and largely untapped part of the workforce. The study combined findings from case studies conducted across seven companies of varying size and industry. Recognizing the limited amount of research on the topic, the investigators sought increased understanding of employer-driven disability initiatives, what motivated them, and what impact they had on the company’s productivity and overall success. The greatest success seemed to come to companies that took the most decisive action in implementing their initiatives.
“It is powerful to appreciate how much inclusion in the workplace can be a competitive advantage. At the same time, it’s important to point out that companies adopting a disability initiative on more of a trial basis or with more skepticism generated less favorable results,” noted co-investigator Timothy N. Tansey, PhD, University of Wisconsin-Madison. “Many employers prioritize diversity but underinvest in providing support for people with disabilities.”
Co-investigator Paul Wehman, PhD, Virginia Commonwealth University and Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, noted, “The literature suggested we would find a relationship between employer disability initiatives and company performance, and that commitment from leadership would be influential. However, we were surprised to learn that the disability initiatives had such a positive impact on non-disabled co-workers. Many employees with whom we spoke reported feeling a new sense of pride in the company and a greater closeness to their co-workers.”
Dr. Phillips commented that companies in the study all shared a value of being employee-centered, acknowledging that employees didn’t exist solely to help the company, but that the company also existed to help and support employees through flexibility, training, upward mobility, and compensation.
# # #
NOTES FOR EDITORS
The article is “Effect of company-driven disability diversity initiatives: A multi-case study across industries,” by Brian N. Phillips, Teresa A. Granger, Chase Ochrach, Kathryn A. Thomas, Antonio Reyes, Rachel Friefeld Kesselmayer, Catherine A. Anderson, Fong Chan, David R. Strauser, Paul Wehman, Jennifer McDonough, Deborah Lee, Beatrice Lee, Ngonidzashe Mpofu, Stacie Castillo, Xiangli Chen, Emily A. Brinck, Megan J. Baumunk, Jaeyoung Kim, Katherine B. Friedman, and Timothy N. Tansey (https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-230061) Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, Volume 60, Issue 1 (January 2024), published by IOS Press.
The full text of the article and additional information are also available to credentialed journalists upon request; contact Diana Murray, IOS Press, at +1 718-640-5678 or d.murray@iospress.com. Journalists who wish to interview the authors should contact Brian N. Phillips, PhD, CRC, at brian.phillips@usu.edu.
The research reported in this article was partially funded by a grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant number 90RT5041) awarded to Dr. Paul Wehman. NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, or HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.
ABOUT THE JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION
The Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation provides a forum for discussion and dissemination of information about the major areas that constitute vocational rehabilitation. Emphasis is on publishing rehabilitation articles that have immediate application for helping rehabilitation counselors, psychologists, and other professionals in providing direct services to people with disabilities. www.iospress.com/journal-of-vocational-rehabilitation
ABOUT IOS PRESS
IOS Press is an international scientific, technical, medical (STM) publishing house established in 1987 in Amsterdam. We produce around 90 journals and 70 books annually in a broad range of subject categories, primarily specializing in health and life sciences (including neurosciences, medical informatics, cancer research, and rehabilitation) and computer sciences (including artificial intelligence, data science, and semantic web). In addition, we offer specialized services that support scientific advancement. www.iospress.com
