Leading researchers in childhood TBI from around the world share their work related to the challenges of returning to school and recommend strategies to improve the experience for parents/carers and students in NeuroRehabilitation
Over the past decade, there have been improvements in bringing awareness and training about TBI to educators, but there are limited data about effective interventions for students with TBI including information about and how to improve communication and coordinate care between schools and medical/health organizations.
The collection of papers in this themed issue on “Pediatric Educational Re-Entry After Traumatic Brain Injury” is guest-edited by Melissa McCart, EdD, University of Oregon, Eugene, and Susan Davies, EdD, University of Dayton.
“There are emerging programs that may be effective for students with TBI,” explained Dr. McCart. “They show promise in improving educator knowledge and self-efficacy about TBI and demonstrate preliminary effects on improving school-based services for students with TBI. As practices slowly change to align with research, we must continue to increase awareness and strive to improve outcomes for children with TBI.”
“Vulnerable and diverse populations are at increased risk for sustaining a TBI and experiencing poor outcomes; these students need representation in TBI studies so we can better understand their experiences and meet their needs,” noted Dr. Davies.
Two of the articles in this issue explore parent/carer and educator views about the impact of RTS after a brain injury. In the article entitled “Returning to education after childhood acquired brain injury: Learning from lived parental experience,” by Emily Bennett, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; and BRILL Team, Nottingham Children’s Hospital, and colleagues explore the lived experience of parents and carers to focus on what can both help and hinder the process. The aim was to understand more about RTS from parents’ perspectives to inform best practice and facilitate improvements in service delivery.
A service evaluation explored parent/carer views about the RTS process and the support received from healthcare professionals at a regional center in the UK. Questionnaires were sent to parents of patients treated for an acquired brain injury in the last two years. Responses from about 30 parents highlight the many challenges of RTS and revealed six key themes: Parental mindset and growth; what they need to know; specialist support and information; talk and share; challenges of new and hidden needs; and don’t forget them!
“Parents offer crucial insight into the challenges of the RTS process,” commented Dr. Bennett. “Their feedback draws attention to important factors for service development and reminds professionals of the key components of an effective return.”
A longitudinal qualitative study tracked students with TBI from hospital discharge through their return to school and subsequently for an average of four years of school to better understand the experiences of students and parents. Researchers interviewed parents and educators of 21 students with TBI using open-ended questions plus observed students in the classroom.
“We identified three themes,” explained lead investigator Dr. McCart. “Lack of student tracking year to year, lack of educator training, and conflicting views between educators and parents about students’ needs. These factors ultimately led to parent frustration and eventually conflict and deteriorating relationships between parents and educators. We suggest that improving educator training could positively affect the factors identified and possibly mitigate parent frustration.”
“It is critically important to train educators to work with students who return to school following TBI and to track these students over the course of their school careers in order to meet their changing instructional and emotional needs,” added co-investigator Bonnie Todis, PhD, Center on Brain Injury Research and Training, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon.
Four key recommendations emerged from this collection of papers are:
• Create protocols that emphasize intentional collaboration between systems, developing and implementing policy. This can help improve quality for both students and their families.
• Identify sources of funding to support care coordination.
• Use guided credible history interviews in the special education eligibility determination process when official medical documentation is not available. This can help ensure that students who need special education services are appropriately identified.
• Conduct more robust experimental evaluation of educational interventions for TBI.
“While there are many challenges to overcome, such as the need for improved care coordination, educator training, and family support, the good news is that awareness continues to grow in the general public about brain injury, brain injury prevention, and the challenges a brain injury can create for students,” concluded the Guest Editors. “This awareness is a vital step in driving change and improvement in school practices.”
# # #
NOTES FOR EDITORS
Thematic issue: Pediatric Educational Re-Entry After Traumatic Brain Injury
NeuroRehabilitation, Volume 52 Issue 4 (June 2023), published by IOS Press.
Melissa McCart, EdD, University of Oregon, Eugene,
Susan Davies, EdD, University of Dayton
“Returning to education after childhood acquired brain injury: Learning from lived parental experience,” by E. Bennett, A. Fletcher, E. Talbot and L. Robinson (https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-220205). It is openly available at https://content.iospress.com/articles/neurorehabilitation/nre220205.
“School experiences following traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal qualitative study,” by Melissa McCart, Bonnie Todis, Douglas Gomez, and Ann Glang (https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-220209). It is openly available at https://content.iospress.com/articles/neurorehabilitation/nre220209.
Bonnie Todis, PI, was supported by the U.S. Department of Education. Grant #H324C040148.
Full text is available to journalists upon request. Contact Diana Murray, IOS Press, at +1 718-640-5678 or email@example.com for additional information. Journalists who wish to interview the Guest Editors or authors should contact Melissa McCart, EdD, at +1 541-543-6334 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
NeuroRehabilitation: An Interdisciplinary Journal is an international journal that emphasizes publication of scientifically based practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. Founded in 1991, NeuroRehabilitation features peer-reviewed articles that are interdisciplinary in nature and cover the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease, and other neurological disorders. Information is intended for an interdisciplinary audience. Issues of the journal are thematically organized. Themes have focused on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy, and age groups. www.iospress.com/neurorehabilitation
ABOUT IOS PRESS
IOS Press is an independent international scientific, technical, medical (STM) publishing house established in 1987 in Amsterdam. We produce around 90 journals and 70 books annually in a broad range of subject categories, primarily specializing in health and life sciences (including neurosciences, medical informatics, cancer research, and rehabilitation) and computer sciences (including artificial intelligence, data science, and semantic web). In addition, we offer specialized services that support scientific advancement. www.iospress.com