In a new study in Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, investigators analyzed learning on two different types of video games – action and strategy – to determine if they were functionally different. They found that cognitive performance and white matter connectivity in the brain predicted how best we can learn to play the two types of games.
Researchers discovered unique results from each type of game. Specifically, they found that processing speed and white matter connectivity in a brain region related to memory were linked to learning to play the strategy game, while learning to play the action game was related to a brain region governing mood. Both genres of game lead to better performance on tasks having to do with working memory. They also found that improved performance on a speed task was unique to subjects playing the strategy game.
“When researchers use video games as a tool for cognitive enhancement, they assume that game performance relies on specific cognitive/brain function, yet there is a little evidence that establishes such a connection,” explained lead investigator Chandramallika Basak, PhD, Assistant Professor at The Center for Vital Longevity, University of Texas at Dallas. “Moreover, different researchers use different genres of video games, which makes this game-cognition-brain relationship even more complicated. Therefore, the aim of our study was not only to evaluate the three-way game-cognition-brain relationship, but also to assess this relationship for two different types of games.”
Adults of varying ages were recruited for the study, but all had little to no previous game playing experience. Subjects underwent an MRI scan and then were asked to play two different games, one action game (Tank Attack 3D) and one strategy game (Sushi-Go-Round). To measure white matter integrity, researchers used fractional anisotropy (FA), obtained by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).
Working memory and inhibition predicted learning of both games, but better performance on the perceptual speed task was related only to the strategy game. The DTI results revealed key differences between the two genres of game: white matter FA in the right fornix/stria terminalis correlated with the action game learning and white matter FA in the left cingulum/hippocampus was related to the strategy game learning, even after controlling for age in both cases.
“Although cognition, to a large extent, was a common predictor of both types of game learning, regional white matter FA could separately predict action and strategy game learning,” said Dr. Basak. “Given the neural and cognitive correlates of strategy game learning, strategy games may provide a more beneficial training tool for adults suffering from memory-related disorders or declines in processing speed.”
While researchers found that playing strategy games better engaged memory and cognitive control brain regions, making them better suited for improving memory tasks, they hypothesize that action games that stimulate the limbic area and elicit more emotional arousal might be beneficial for other clinical populations like patients with mood disorders.
White matter integrity of different brain regions uniquely predicts action (in orange) vs strategy game (in green) learning (credit: Chandramallika Basak and Nicholas Ray).
Video games will continue to be the subject of scrutiny, both scientifically and societally, but investigators hope that this study opens the door to thinking about the nuances of different types of games. “Not all games are created equal, yet people generalize results from one video game to other video games,” concluded Dr. Basak. “Such oversimplification has serious consequences on research on video game training. I believe that we need to investigate the specific brain-cognition associations for different genres of video games before theorizing about the potential impact of a training on a particular genre of video game.”
###
NOTES FOR EDITORS
Full study: “Evaluating the relationship between white matter integrity, cognition, and varieties of video game learning,” by Nicholas R. Ray, Margaret A. O'Connell, Kaoru Nashiro, Evan T. Smith, Shuo Qin, and Chandramallika Basak. Published online in advance of Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, Volume 35, Issue 5 (October 2017), DOI 10.3233/RNN-160716, by IOS Press.
This project was supported in part by funding provided to Dr. Chandramallika Basak by the Darrell K Royal Research Fund for Alzheimer’s Disease. We thank W. Christian Martin, Xi Chen, M. Irene Cunha, Melissa Druskis and Juan Mijares for assistance with data collection.
Contacts:
Full text of the article is available to credentialed journalists upon request. Contact Diana Murray, IOS Press at +1 718-640-5678 or d.murray@iospress.com.
Journalists wishing to interview the authors should contact Chandramallika Basak at cbasak@utdallas.edu.
ABOUT RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE
An interdisciplinary journal under the editorial leadership of Bernhard Sabel, PhD, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience publishes papers relating the plasticity and response of the nervous system to accidental or experimental injuries and their interventions, transplantation, neurodegenerative disorders and experimental strategies to improve regeneration or functional recovery and rehabilitation. Experimental and clinical research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant experimental or clinical relevance and interest to a multidisciplinary audience. www.iospress.nl/journal/restorative-neurology- and-neuroscience
RNN Editorial Office:
Prof. Dr. Bernhard Sabel
Institut für Medizinische Psychologie
Medizinische Fakultät
Otto-v.- Guericke Universität Magdeburg
39120 Magdeburg
Germany
T: +49 391 672 1800
E: rnn@med.ovgu.de
ABOUT IOS PRESS
Celebrating its 30th anniversary in 2017, IOS Press (www.iospress.com) is headquartered in Amsterdam with satellite offices in the USA, Germany, India and China and serves the information needs of scientific and medical communities worldwide. IOS Press now publishes over 100 international journals and about 75 book titles each year on subjects ranging from computer sciences and mathematics to medicine and the natural sciences.